KWSS finally got their signal working. Running from bears now playing live. http://tinyurl.com/n2ztet

Check out "Running From Bears" on KWSS. Modern jazz. Playing live from 7-9PM PT. http://tinyurl.com/n2ztet

WaPo exposes ObamaCare "cost containment" scheme. Paying doctors to encourage olds folks to die faster. http://tinyurl.com/nv7vje

Peter Schiff running for Senate in CT. Anti-bailout, pro-prosperity. On youtube at http://tinyurl.com/kkyvfu and http://tinyurl.com/quwfhw

I came across an old article by Fr. Paul Scalia while doing research for my latest Sotomayor post. It's called "Ritus Narcissus," and, like most things he writes, it's rather good. He digs into the lyrics of common hymns -- the sort you hear in practically every Catholic church in America -- and explains why they're just not appropriate for the Mass.

To appreciate the damage done by such hymns, we must first call to mind two essential aspects of the Mass: presence and dialogue. First of all, what distinguishes the Mass from all other forms of worship is the re-presentation of Christ's sacrifice. The Mass does not merely recall or reenact Christ's redemptive act but in fact makes present the mystery of faith, the passion, death and resurrection of Christ (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1366).

Second, the presence of Christ in the Eucharist and indeed throughout the Mass makes possible a real dialogue between God and man; it creates an active conversation. The remembrance of someone does not lead to dialogue with that person; only to reminiscing. The presence of Christ in the Mass, however, inspires us to speak to Him as only the beloved can speak to the Lover. Thus the Mass is a dialogue between Christ and the Church, between God and man, in which God speaks His lines and we speak ours. He speaks to us through the readings and (we hope) the homily, while we respond to Him through the prayers of the priest, our personal prayers, and the hymns.

Accordingly, active participation at Mass requires the faithful to acknowledge the presence of Christ and enter the dialogue, taking the words of the Bride as their own. They embody the Bride, and their Mass parts -- the Kyrie, Gloria, Sanctus, and Agnus Dei ­ express her desire for union with the Bridegroom. Other texts used at Mass should reflect and deepen this sentiment. The dialogue reaches its culmination at the Consecration, when the Bridegroom speaks His definitive words of love and thus becomes really present to His Bride in the Eucharist.

Given the lyrics of much contemporary liturgical music, however, we must ask what has become of this dialogue and our ability to enter it. Many hymns have us sing only about ourselves and to ourselves, even going so far as to usurp God's part. Such words fail to convey the true meaning of the Mass as a dialogue between Christ and the Church. The offending lyrics come in two varieties: in the first, we sing to one another and about one another, but do not include God in the conversation; and in the second, we sing God's parts.

Unfortunately, he gives numerous examples of bad hymns, but no examples of proper ones. I kept waiting for a counterpoint at the end. "This is an example of where we are singing to God as God," etc. Scalia references the "Kyrie, Gloria, Sanctus and Agnus Dei," but surely there must be some more contemporary hymns that have appropriate lyrical content. I wonder which hymns he recommends, exactly?

Glick takedown of Obama's foreign policy is masterful. http://tinyurl.com/kum5na

Unless someone can refute these facts, the condemnation of Honduras is merely a "high tech lynching." http://tinyurl.com/ndh8nq